Job Scheduler

add schedules/schedule elemens to config xml

Details

  • Type: Sub-task Sub-task
  • Status: Closed Closed
  • Priority: Major Major
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • Affects Version/s: None
  • Fix Version/s: 1.3.5
  • Component/s: Job Scheduler Binaries
  • Description:
    Hide

    Add a new <schedules> element as child of <config>
    <schedules> element can have <schedule> children:
    <schedule> element has a name attribute and the same children as a <run_time> element, e.g.:

    <schedules>
    <schedule name="in_the_morning" title="Morning Schedule">
    <weekdays>
    <day day="1 2 3 4 5">
    <period single_start="07:30"/>
    </day>
    </weekdays>
    </schedule>
    <schedule name="in_the_evening">
    ...
    </schedule>
    </schedules>

    Schedules can be referenced in run times:
    <job name="hello">
    <process file="hello.sh"/>
    <run_time schedule="in_the_morning"/>
    </job>

    Enhancements to XML Answers:
    /spooler/answer/job, /spooler/answer/jobs/job, /spooler/answer/order and all other nested order elements get a new attribute active_schedule, which points to the schedule currently used by this job/order (which may be a replacement schedule). If the job/order is not using a schedule, the attribute is not created.

    <show_state what="schedules"/> returns a listing of all schedules and the jobs/orders which are using this schedule. Replacement schedules are also returned. Schedules which are currently active (either the standard schedule which is currently not replaced, or a replacement schedule which is currently replacing another schedule) get an attribute active="yes", all others have active="no", e.g.:

    <spooler>
    <answer>
    <state>
    <schedules>
    <schedule path="/samples/in_the_morning" name="in_the_morning" title="Morning Schedule"
    active="yes">
    <weekdays>
    <day day="1 2 3 4 5">
    <period single_start="07:30"/>
    </day>
    </weekdays>
    <file_based .../>
    <schedule.users>
    <schedule.user job="/samples/jobA11"/>
    <schedule.user job_chain="/samples/chain_A"
    order="/samples/order_A"/>
    </schedule.users>
    </schedule>
    <schedule path="/samples/in_the_morning_replacement_1"
    name="in_the_morning_replacement_1" substitute="/samples/in_the_morning"
    valid_from="2008-04-12 00:00:00" valid_to="2008-04-13 23:59:00" active="no">
    <weekdays>
    <day day="1 2 3 4 5">
    <period single_start="09:30"/>
    <period single_start="15:30"/>
    </day>
    </weekdays>
    </schedule>
    </schedules>
    </state>
    </answer>
    </spooler>

    Show
    Add a new <schedules> element as child of <config> <schedules> element can have <schedule> children: <schedule> element has a name attribute and the same children as a <run_time> element, e.g.: <schedules> <schedule name="in_the_morning" title="Morning Schedule"> <weekdays> <day day="1 2 3 4 5"> <period single_start="07:30"/> </day> </weekdays> </schedule> <schedule name="in_the_evening"> ... </schedule> </schedules> Schedules can be referenced in run times: <job name="hello"> <process file="hello.sh"/> <run_time schedule="in_the_morning"/> </job> Enhancements to XML Answers: /spooler/answer/job, /spooler/answer/jobs/job, /spooler/answer/order and all other nested order elements get a new attribute active_schedule, which points to the schedule currently used by this job/order (which may be a replacement schedule). If the job/order is not using a schedule, the attribute is not created. <show_state what="schedules"/> returns a listing of all schedules and the jobs/orders which are using this schedule. Replacement schedules are also returned. Schedules which are currently active (either the standard schedule which is currently not replaced, or a replacement schedule which is currently replacing another schedule) get an attribute active="yes", all others have active="no", e.g.: <spooler> <answer> <state> <schedules> <schedule path="/samples/in_the_morning" name="in_the_morning" title="Morning Schedule" active="yes"> <weekdays> <day day="1 2 3 4 5"> <period single_start="07:30"/> </day> </weekdays> <file_based .../> <schedule.users> <schedule.user job="/samples/jobA11"/> <schedule.user job_chain="/samples/chain_A" order="/samples/order_A"/> </schedule.users> </schedule> <schedule path="/samples/in_the_morning_replacement_1" name="in_the_morning_replacement_1" substitute="/samples/in_the_morning" valid_from="2008-04-12 00:00:00" valid_to="2008-04-13 23:59:00" active="no"> <weekdays> <day day="1 2 3 4 5"> <period single_start="09:30"/> <period single_start="15:30"/> </day> </weekdays> </schedule> </schedules> </state> </answer> </spooler>

Activity

Hide
Andreas Liebert added a comment - 29 January 2008 11:22

Ich denke, es wäre eleganter, <run_time> als Unterelement von <schedule> wegzulassen, sodass <schedule> genau den Inhalt hat, den man in <run_time> hineinkopieren würde, also:

<schedules>
<schedule name="in_the_morning">
<weekdays>
<day day="1 2 3 4 5">
<period single_start="07:30"/>
</day>
</weekdays>
</schedule>
<schedule name="in_the_evening">
...
</schedule>
</schedules>

Die Referenzierung würde dann als Unterelement von <run_time> erfolgen, damit man auch mehrere schedules kombinieren kann:
<job name="hello">
<process file="hello.sh"/>
<run_time>
<schedule name="in_the_morning"/>
<schedule name="in_the_evening"/>
</run_time>
</job>

Oder analog zu den locks <schedule.use schedule="in_the_morning"/>...

Show
Andreas Liebert added a comment - 29 January 2008 11:22 Ich denke, es wäre eleganter, <run_time> als Unterelement von <schedule> wegzulassen, sodass <schedule> genau den Inhalt hat, den man in <run_time> hineinkopieren würde, also: <schedules> <schedule name="in_the_morning"> <weekdays> <day day="1 2 3 4 5"> <period single_start="07:30"/> </day> </weekdays> </schedule> <schedule name="in_the_evening"> ... </schedule> </schedules> Die Referenzierung würde dann als Unterelement von <run_time> erfolgen, damit man auch mehrere schedules kombinieren kann: <job name="hello"> <process file="hello.sh"/> <run_time> <schedule name="in_the_morning"/> <schedule name="in_the_evening"/> </run_time> </job> Oder analog zu den locks <schedule.use schedule="in_the_morning"/>...
Hide
Andreas Liebert added a comment - 30 January 2008 14:20

Die Wiederholung von schedules wird zunächst nicht implementiert.
In <run_time> gibt es ein schedule= Attribut.

(Sollen später Wiederholungen erlaubt werden, könnte man dies mit wiederholten run_time Elementen realisieren).

Das Beispiel sieht dann also so aus:
<schedules>
<schedule name="in_the_morning">
<weekdays>
<day day="1 2 3 4 5">
<period single_start="07:30"/>
</day>
</weekdays>
</schedule>
<schedule name="in_the_evening">
...
</schedule>
</schedules>

<job name="hello">
<process file="hello.sh"/>
<run_time schedule="in_the_morning"/>
</job>

Show
Andreas Liebert added a comment - 30 January 2008 14:20 Die Wiederholung von schedules wird zunächst nicht implementiert. In <run_time> gibt es ein schedule= Attribut. (Sollen später Wiederholungen erlaubt werden, könnte man dies mit wiederholten run_time Elementen realisieren). Das Beispiel sieht dann also so aus: <schedules> <schedule name="in_the_morning"> <weekdays> <day day="1 2 3 4 5"> <period single_start="07:30"/> </day> </weekdays> </schedule> <schedule name="in_the_evening"> ... </schedule> </schedules> <job name="hello"> <process file="hello.sh"/> <run_time schedule="in_the_morning"/> </job>
Hide
Joacim Zschimmer added a comment - 01 February 2008 11:31

Definition mit <run_time> und Abruf mit <run_time schedule="..."> sind zwei verschiedene Dinge. Besser wäre das bereits vorgeschlagene <schedule.use schedule="..."/>.

<schedule> ist identisch mit <run_time>.

Show
Joacim Zschimmer added a comment - 01 February 2008 11:31 Definition mit <run_time> und Abruf mit <run_time schedule="..."> sind zwei verschiedene Dinge. Besser wäre das bereits vorgeschlagene <schedule.use schedule="..."/>. <schedule> ist identisch mit <run_time>.
Hide
Andreas Liebert added a comment - 15 April 2008 11:46

Die Beschreibung des Issues wurde aktualisiert. Es gilt, was dort steht, die Kommentare sind nicht von Bedeutung.

Show
Andreas Liebert added a comment - 15 April 2008 11:46 Die Beschreibung des Issues wurde aktualisiert. Es gilt, was dort steht, die Kommentare sind nicht von Bedeutung.
Hide
Andreas Liebert added a comment - 25 April 2008 16:51

Absatz über XML Antworten hinzugefügt

Show
Andreas Liebert added a comment - 25 April 2008 16:51 Absatz über XML Antworten hinzugefügt
Hide
Andreas Liebert added a comment - 25 April 2008 17:43

Schedules haben auch einen title

Show
Andreas Liebert added a comment - 25 April 2008 17:43 Schedules haben auch einen title

People

Dates

  • Created:
    25 January 2008 16:27
    Updated:
    24 July 2008 11:09
    Resolved:
    24 July 2008 11:09